Friday, February 15, 2008

Contemptible

The House of Representatives voted yesterday to hold two high level Bush advisors in contempt for failing to cooperate with a Congressional inquiry into the purge of federal prosecutors in 2006-2007. White House chief of staff Josh Bolten is charged with failing to testify and former White House counsel Harriet Miers is charged with refusing to turn over documents related to the political motivations of the firings.

Republicans staged a walkout because they said the contempt orders were politically motivated. Of course the contempt orders carried a political subtext as did the walkout. But to assert that Congress is political is not an argument. The political posturing is what it is; it should obfuscate an analysis of the substance of the matter.

The republican walkout, however, is designed to avoid the substance of the matter. The democrats are trying to make as much hay as possible, but that is not a reason to ignore the seriousness of Executive branch staffers refusing to cooperate with the Constitutionally mandated oversight responsibility of Congress. The Congress represents We The People and must be vigilant in checking the power of executive branch officials. It is imperative to our judicial system that federal prosecutors serve the law. If the White House puts partisanship over the law it does serious damage to the rule of law. Republicans are failing Congress, the Judiciary, and the country. If Bolten, Meirs, and the White House did nothing unseemly then the move will backfire on the democrats. Open government, the rule of law, and Congressional oversight are far more important than the partisan concerns of the Bush Administration.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Garcia said...

Media seem to pose the question repeatedly, "Is Congress wasting its time with political posturing?" The assumption being that any check on the executive has to be politically motivated, and as has been said politicians, and human beings for that matter, are political animals. That being said, there is a perception that any questioning of the Executive by the Legislative is purely or only politically motivated. The U.S. Government was founded on the principles of checks and balances and in my opinion there hasn't been enough of a check on the executive branch and the idea that members of Congress would refuse to do its duty to at least look into the notion that the executive may have done something wrong is very scary indeed. If we don't have checks and balances our government will become absolutely corrupt, broken, and completely ineffective.

5:28 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home